|
|
There is allot of information on the net about the controversy of annual
vaccine's, below is one article. I recommend that you do your own research
and become educated so you can make an informed decision about vaccinations.
Vaccinations and Our Pets
by Dr. Michael Goldberg, DVM
In this article, I would like to comment on the current controversy with
respect to vaccinations for our pets. The vaccinations are available
because the diseases we vaccinate against do exist. The question has more
to do with potential damage we inflict (iatrogenic disease) by over
vaccinating or vaccinating inappropriately. The purpose of this article is
to display the facts and to imbibe some insight from an experiential point
of view of this author as to the necessity of yearly vaccinations.
In an article published in 1992 in Current Veterinary Therapy XI (A
conventional veterinary text similar to Conn's Current Therapy for human
medicine) by Tom Phillips DVM and Ron Schultz, Ph.D., "A practice
that was started many years ago and that lacks scientific validity or
verification is annual revaccination. Almost with no exception there is no
immunologic requirement for annual revaccination. Immunity to viruses
persists for years or for the life of the animal. Successful vaccination
to most bacterial pathogens produces an immunologic memory that remains
for years, allowing an animal to develop a protective anamnestic
(secondary) response when exposed to virulent organisms. Furthermore,
revaccination with most viral vaccines fails to stimulate an anamnestic
(secondary) response as a result of interference by existing antibody. The
practice of annual vaccination in our opinion should be considered of
questionable efficacy unless it is used as a mechanism to provide an
annual physical examination or is required by law (i.e. certain states
require annual revaccination for rabies)".
As the momentum built, based on what I perceive as fear in both the
public's eye as well as the veterinary community as to the devastating
effects of contagious disease in the 70's, yearly vaccinations have become
commonplace. Low cost vaccination clinics and drug store availability are
now matter of fact. The perception of the general public is that
vaccination is an absolute necessity to ensure a healthy pet. I believe
this to be untrue. By indiscriminant use of vaccination, we may actually
be causing more harm than good.
In a 1998 report, the American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP),
and the Academy of Feline Medicine (AFM) Advisory Panel on Feline
Vaccines, recommended new guidelines for feline vaccination protocols,
recommending vaccination to be done on cats every three years after kitten
vaccines and their first year booster. Many U.S. Veterinary Colleges have
adopted this protocol as well. These differ from standard practices
including the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association's current
recommended protocol as stated in 1999 (recommending yearly vaccinations
until further scientific research is completed).
These recommendations were based on a study published in 1997 in Feline
Practice. Based on vaccination at 8 and 12 weeks of age, positive antibody
titres to feline Panleukopenia, feline Herpes, and feline Calici virus
lasted six, three, and four years respectively. When these cats were
challenged with the viruses, there were a number who got ill but recovered
uneventfully.
My Experience
I have been practicing veterinary medicine in British Columbia for the
past 12 years. For the most part of those years, I practiced in an area
that I feel is endemic to a number of diseases that affect our pet
population. These include canine Parvovirus canine Distemper and feline
Panleukopenia, Herpes and Calici viruses.
Having had the experience of working in a very busy practice in an endemic
area, I estimate having seen approximately 1,500 to 2,000 cases of canine
Parvo, and about a dozen cases of dog distemper. Of all of these
experiences, only a handful or less have been adult dogs (with either no
vaccination history or minimal vaccine history). The majority of the cases
I have witnessed have been puppies that have been unvaccinated. As for
feline disease, I have seen thousands of cases of Herpes and Calici viral
infections and about a dozen cases of feline Panleukopenia (feline
distemper). In my experience, the vast majority of cases have recovered
with proper treatment.
I have no doubt that vaccines can help our pets. Based on the above study,
I ask the question: do we need to vaccinate as often as every 12 months?
The protocols that have been established over the years are to vaccinate
on an annual basis. I have seen many diseases that have sprung up that I
can associate with over vaccination. There are a number of well documented
ìside affectsî to vaccinations. By far, the most common being
anaphylaxis, or acute life threatening systemic reaction to repeated
vaccine, much like a bee sting reaction. There is also the issue of
vaccine- induced sarcoma (cancer at the vaccination site) which is
relatively rare unless it is your pet who gets this condition. Immune
hemolytic anemia (a condition where the immune system attacks and destroys
the red blood cells) and a rise in antibodies against the thyroid gland
are two very well documented vaccination reactions. What about those
problems that are less subtle such as skin problems such as allergies,
chronic upper respiratory disease, chronic cystitis (bladder
inflammation), arthritis, seizure disorders, and so on. These conditions
have been noted to develop in close association with the timing of
vaccines. In my homeopathic practice, it is imperative to gather a
detailed medical history of each of my patients, and through careful
observation, I have noticed the chronological appearance of a number of
conditions that appear to be related to the timing of vaccination.
What can we do about the vaccination quandary?
First and foremost, I would suggest maintaining optimal health through
good nutrition and good vitamin supplementation. Lifestyle is important in
minimizing the stress and maximizing exerciseÖ something we all are aware
of. Another imperative is to see to it that our pets are parasite free,
which includes internal as well as external parasites such as fleas and
worms. A simple stool sample can elicit much information in this regard.
Conventional safe dewormers or herbals preparations can be used as
prevention.
As for the vaccination question, there are a growing number of ways that
you can hedge that your pet is protected. I still vaccinate puppies and
kittens, though this is an individual decision that I discuss with each
and every client as to the risks and benefits. I try to minimize the
number of vaccines that I give as I feel when it comes to vaccination more
is not better! In fact, some practitioners suggest using single ingredient
vaccinations and rotating them every year. I urge every one of you that if
your pet is ill with any ailment, DO NOT VACCINATE,
as this seems to compound the stress on your pet! In fact, the vaccines
are labeled for use on healthy pets only! Wait until they are fully
healthy (i.e. no illness whatsoever). Homeopathic remedies such as Thuja,
Silicea, or Sulphur, can be used after vaccination to prevent any untoward
effects.
A growing number of my clients elect to have their pet's antibodies tested
to ensure adequate levels of antibody to the diseases that we see in our
area. This is known as titer testing. It is based on the fact that if
there a certain minimum level of antibodies in the system directed against
the virus, if the pet comes in contact with that virus, he/she will mount
a protective response. The above study in cats was based on testing the
levels of antibodies the cats had developed from a series of 2 kitten
vaccinations.
In the past 2-1/2 years, I have been recommending titer testing to my
clients. In 95% of the tests I have done thus far (these are excluding
totals over the past 6 years of testing), these pets have NOT REQUIRED the
yearly booster for canine distemper and parvo virus. My conclusion is that
the vaccinations may very well last for more than the usual one year. I
have had numerous pets that have remained protected after a five year
absence in vaccination.
Homeopathic nosodes are another option though their efficacy remains
questionable. Nosodes are homeopathic preparations of the actual disease
in which we are trying to prevent. A sort of vaccination made from the
actual discharges and prepared specifically according to strict
homeopathic guidelines.
Dr. Chris Day, a veterinary Homeopath in England showed that nosodes were
more effective at reducing disease than vaccines, in a study of Kennel
Cough.
The issue of vaccination is a complex one at best. I hope this article
enlightens you to inquire more into this question and gives you a topic to
discuss with your veterinarian. The important issue to take with you form
this is to weigh the risks and the benefits of any procedure you do with
your pet.
References:
Current Veterinary Therapy XI, 1992, Saunders Publishing
Veterinary Medicine August 1999, pp. 727-735
Homeopathic Care for Cats and Dogs, Don Hamilton, 1999, North Atlantic
Books
Homeopathic Treatment of Small Animals, Christopher Day, 1990, C.W. Daniel
Company
The Current Vaccination Debate
Vaccinations have become quite a hot topic to debate these days. There are
a number of veterinary schools in the US, which have gone to giving the
vaccinations every three years instead of giving them yearly. Some
veterinarians in Canada have also taken this approach. Why? There is more
evidence now, that as we look at vaccinations, they were once thought of
as benign procedures. This means that they were thought of, as they could
do no harm. It was arbitrarily decided some time ago that yearly
vaccinations would be done among the veterinary community and as such,
this habit caught on. There was never any proof that this needed to be
done for all the vaccines now available. The advantage that most
veterinarians saw by this was that physical examinations, which often
precede the vaccination, would benefit the pet and thus reveal a number of
early conditions that were treatable.
There are growing numbers of veterinarians now who believe that all this
yearly vaccination may in fact be hurting your pet. There are a number of
well documented side effects to vaccinations such as immune hemolytic
anemia, vaccine induced fibrosarcoma, anaphylaxis, and a number of less
well documented or suspected conditions to pets from over vaccinating such
as skin allergies, chronic upper respiratory conditions, behavior problems
etc.
Should I vaccinate my pet?
Firstly, you should know as much as you can about each of the diseases and
the risks associated with them. Next, you should know about the potential
risks of vaccinating your pet. These decisions may be difficult and as
such you may seek guidance in these areas. As you can see this is not such
an easy task.
Before coming to Hudson Place Veterinary Clinic, I worked in a very busy
practice seeing about 25 patients everyday. As the years rolled by, I was
able to see quite a number of patients and deal with a very wide variety
of illness. The most common illness I saw was Parvovirus in dogs. I have
literally seen thousands of cases. By far, the majority of cases were in
young dogs between the ages of six and twenty weeks that were unvaccinated
or partially vaccinated as puppies. I have seen about a dozen cases of
distemper in the dog and again, these were unvaccinated young puppies. As
far as Feline diseases, I have seen a number of distemper cases in kittens
as well as Feline leukemia and feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). The
numbers of Rinotracheitis and Calici viral infections I have seen is
staggering. Besides Feline leukemia and FIP, the other diseases are
generally diseases of young kittens that are unvaccinated. The exception
is that the rhino and Calici can affect vaccinated adult cats as well as
young unvaccinated kittens but appears to be less severe.
As time went on in my busy practice, I also saw a number of animals who at
young ages developed recurrent skin infections, ear infections, stiffness
and arthritis, seizure disorders and on and on. In looking at the
patients, a high proportion of these problems appeared to come after the
annual vaccinations were given. The problem would then settle down only to
recur after the next years vaccines were administered. Naturally, one
might question whether the vaccines had anything to do with the subsequent
illness. I think the answer is a strong yes.
I have come to embrace a number of practices that are not like your
everyday veterinarian. The first is to minimize the foreign substances
that we put into their bodies in order to maximize health. I have seen the
ravages of these diseases that we vaccinate against and as such, I feel
that immunity is a useful thing. I want to make sure all may patients have
some form of immunity against these diseases, but I refuse to over do it!
How not to over do it.
With the owner's consent, I recommend vaccines at 8 and 12 weeks. With the
newer vaccines available, literally all animals tested will respond to the
vaccine and mount a successful immune response that will protect them at
this age. I also deal with risk. This is to say that diseases that are
most likely in the area, are the ones that I recommend vaccinating
against. These include for dogs, Parvo and Distemper and for cats,
Distemper and upper respiratory disease(Rhino and Calici). As to the other
available vaccines, these are done on an individual basis and I will weigh
the risks as to the benefit of vaccination.
What about yearly vaccines?
I strongly believe these are unnecessary. In my experience, I am certain
that the vaccines do not ìturn offî in a year. Most of the contagious
disease I have seen in clinical situations have been in young dogs
and cats who have been unvaccinated or poorly vaccinated as well as
malnourished. I believe that before we continue to inject foreign
substances year after year into our pets, which I believe, can cause harm,
that we should first make sure they absolutely need it. If they don't,
then why do it?
Titre Testing:
A titre is a measure of the level of antibody in the blood stream. In
theory, if there is a certain amount of measurable antibodies in the
blood, then one can assume there is a ìmemoryî that has developed in the
immune system against the virus for which we had vaccinated against (or
had come in contact with). I recommend this test be done at the first year
vaccination time instead of blindly vaccinating. If the level of antibody
is very low, then we vaccinate. I have been performing this test since
1997 and how found it very useful for indicating the necessity for repeat
vaccination. Most of the pets I test, end up not requiring the
vaccinations on a yearly basis.
Are there other choices for protection?
There are homeopathic nosodes that might confer some protection to your
pet. The first cautionary note is to say that there are very few studies
in which they have proven effective. One such study though is by a British
Veterinary Homeopath named Chris Day in which the incidence of Kennel
Cough was in fact lower among dogs treated with homeopathy as opposed to
dogs who had been vaccinated.
Homeopathic nosodes are actually medicines made from diseased tissue.
There are nosodes from all the infectious diseases of dogs and cats. The
nosode is given prophylactically to the pet to theoretically prevent the
disease from affecting him/her. A growing number of breeders and pet
owners ore using this form of prevention because they realize that
vaccines can come with fairly sturdy side effects.
The bottom line is that there is still controversy surrounding this topic.
As the debate goes on though, I feel this method of vaccinating is the
healthiest method thus far.
Here¹s a list of all the diseases that can be
vaccinated against:
Canine Vaccinations:
Parvovirus: this virus has affinity for the intestinal
tract. The signs of infection are malaise, with vomiting and/or diarrhea.
It is very stable in the environment and can be carried on clothing. It
can also sit on the ground for long periods waiting for the dog to contact
it. It is found in stool as well. It can also affect rapidly growing
tissues such as bone and heart, in young dogs. The virus still seems to be
very common and I have seen at least 3 thousand cases.
Distemper: this virus is spread by oronasal route and is
very serious. It usually starts with flu like symptoms such as nasal and
eye discharge. There can also be vomiting and diarrhea. The virus can also
infect the central nervous system and may cause signs such as seizures or
jerky movements in the dog. I have seen about a dozen cases in 12 years of
practice.
Infectious Canine hepatitis (CAV1): this virus is very
stable in the environment and as such can be carried on clothing and on
the surfaces of other animals as well as parasites (fleas). The virus
mainly affects the liver, kidneys and the eye. The virus can cause signs
such as vomiting, diarrhea and fever. There can be bleeding as well. There
may also be a hazing in the cornea. Depending on how the body (IMMUNE
SYSTEM) reacts to it, there can be guarded to a good prognosis. I have
personally never seen a case in 12 years of veterinary practice.
Canine Adenovirus type 2: this virus causes upper
respiratory signs such as coughing. It primarily causes laryngitis and
tracheitis.
Parainfluenza: this virus also attacks the upper
respiratory system of dogs and as such, causes coughing and honking
sounds. It is spread by the oronasal route and can cause laryngitis and
bronchitis.
Corona Virus: this is an intestinal virus that causes
mild diarrhea. It is non-life threatening but is thought to potentially
complicate Parvovirus infection. Once a pet has been exposed to this virus
it is thought that they develop lifelong immunity.
Leptospirosis: this bacterium is zoonotic (can be spread
from animals to humans). The bacteria can enter the skin through an
abrasion and then can cause kidney disease as well as chronic active
hepatitis. Once infected, the body can either fight off the bacteria or
can go into a carrier state in which the bacteria can be shed through the
urine (this depends on the individual immunity to the bacteria). There is
current controversy as to the necessity of this bacteria to be included in
the vaccines as the type of bacteria to cause this disease is different
than the ones currently included in combination vaccinations.
Bordetella: this bacterium is thought to be the primary
bacteria in Kennel Cough. There is a synergy that occurs between
Parainfluenza and Bordetella in Kennel Cough disease. The bacteria can
take up to 14 weeks to be cleared from the lungs once it establishes an
infection.
Lyme: this is a bacterium that is spread through the tick
(Ixodes pacificus and I. dammini). It usually takes the tick 48 hours to
transmit the bacteria. 2% of the ticks studied in the province carry the
bacteria and of those, only 10% will transmit (which means 500 ticks will
have a high risk). The signs are fever, lethargy, acute onset of stiffness
or pain with lameness and sometimes swelling of the joints. Mostly there
are two or more joints involved and a common area is the wrist joint (carpus).
The bacteria can also affect the heart muscle and have been shown to cause
neurological effects. The vaccine has been available for about the
past 10 years and has a high incidence of vaccine associated stiffness.
There are also anecdotal cases of postvaccinal meningitis.
Giardia: This is a vaccine for an intestinal parasite
that causes cramping and diarrhea, and is non life-threatening. It can be
picked up from stagnant water exposed to fecal matter.
|